🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.